Bottleneck Calculator

Processors that will work best with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with AM3+ socket

Chart below shows dependence on processor score in bottleneck calculation with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphic card for General Tasks.

We recommend you to upgrade your processor with one of listed below. It will increase frames per second and graphic card utilization. Here is list of processors that will best work with your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphic card. This processors with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti will have less bottleneck than with your current AMD FX-8120 processor.

	FX-9590	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4.7 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	220 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.7 GHz Clock	5 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8350	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8370	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-9370	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4.4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	220 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.4 GHz Clock	4.7 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8320	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8300	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8370E	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8150	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8310	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-8320E	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.2 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-6350	Desktop Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	FX-6330	Desktop Used in	Q4 2016 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores
	FX-6300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	FX-6200	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	FX-8100	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	8 Threads
	FX-6120	Desktop Used in	Q2 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	FX-6100	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	FX-4350	Desktop Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.2 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4150	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4200	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4320	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4330	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	FX-4170	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	4.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.2 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4130	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-4100	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Opteron 3365	Server Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	AM3+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.3 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores
	Opteron 3280	Server Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.4 GHz Clock	2.7 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores

Calculators

• Bottleneck Calculator
• Game Bottleneck Calculator
• FPS Calculator

Processor
Required

Please select processor

Graphic card
Required

Please select graphic card

Purpose
Required

General Tasks

Processor Intense Tasks

Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Please select purpose General Tasks Processor Intense Tasks Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Video game
Required

Please select video game

Screen resolution
Required

Please select screen resolution

Proceed to Calculation

Proceed to Calculation