Bottleneck Calculator

Processors that will work best with Radeon RX 6600 with FM2+ socket

Chart below shows dependence on processor score in bottleneck calculation with AMD Radeon RX 6600 graphic card for General Tasks.

We recommend you to upgrade your processor with one of listed below. It will increase frames per second and graphic card utilization. Here is list of processors that will best work with your AMD Radeon RX 6600 graphic card. This processors with AMD Radeon RX 6600 will have less bottleneck than with your current AMD A6 PRO-7400B processor.

	Athlon X4 845	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	PRO A10-8850B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Athlon X4 880K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10-7860K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10-7890K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	4.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.1 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10 PRO-7850B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	A10-7870K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon X4 870K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10-7850K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon X4 860K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10 PRO-7800B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Athlon X4 840	Desktop Used in	Q1 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.1 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A8-7650K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A8-7600	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.1 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	PRO A8-8650B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.2 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	A8-7670K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10-8750	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	A10-7700K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A10-7800	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A8-8650	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.2 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	A8 PRO-7600B	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.1 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	FX-770K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	PRO A10-8750B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	A6-7480	Desktop Used in	Q2 2019 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6-7470K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	PRO A4-8350B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	A6-7400K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads

Calculators

• Bottleneck Calculator
• Game Bottleneck Calculator
• FPS Calculator

Processor
Required

Please select processor

Graphic card
Required

Please select graphic card

Purpose
Required

General Tasks

Processor Intense Tasks

Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Please select purpose General Tasks Processor Intense Tasks Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Video game
Required

Please select video game

Screen resolution
Required

Please select screen resolution

Proceed to Calculation

Proceed to Calculation