Bottleneck Calculator

Processors that will work best with Radeon Pro WX 7100 with FCLGA1151 socket

Chart below shows dependence on processor score in bottleneck calculation with AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 graphic card for General Tasks.

We recommend you to upgrade your processor with one of listed below. It will increase frames per second and graphic card utilization. Here is list of processors that will best work with your AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 graphic card. This processors with AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 will have less bottleneck than with your current Intel Core i3-7320 processor.

	Core i7-7700T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i5-7600K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	91 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-7600	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-6600K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	91 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-7600T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-7400	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-7500T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.7 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7350K	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	4.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	60 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7300	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7100	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7300T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7101TE	Desktop Used in	Q4 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-7100T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4620	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4600	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4560	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	54 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4600T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4560T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4500	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G4520	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G4400	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	54 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G4500T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G3920	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G4400T	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G3950	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G4930T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2020 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G3930	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G3900	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G3930T	Desktop Used in	Q4 2018 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Xeon E3-1275 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1280 v6	Server Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.9 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1270 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.8 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1245 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1240 v6	Server Used in	Q3 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1275 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1280 v5	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1270 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1240 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1260L v5	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.9 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1230 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1245 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1230 v5	Server Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1225 v5	Server Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E3-1220 v5	Server Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E3-1220 v6	Server Used in	Q4 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E3-1225 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.3 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads

Calculators

• Bottleneck Calculator
• Game Bottleneck Calculator
• FPS Calculator

Processor
Required

Please select processor

Graphic card
Required

Please select graphic card

Purpose
Required

General Tasks

Processor Intense Tasks

Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Please select purpose General Tasks Processor Intense Tasks Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Video game
Required

Please select video game

Screen resolution
Required

Please select screen resolution

Proceed to Calculation

Proceed to Calculation