Bottleneck Calculator

Processors that will work best with GeForce GTX 960A with PGA478 socket

Chart below shows dependence on processor score in bottleneck calculation with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A graphic card for General Tasks.

We don't recommend you to downgrade your processor if you physically own it because there is no good reason to replace current processor with weaker one. Here is list of processors that will best work with your NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A graphic card. This processors with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A will have less bottleneck than with your current Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 processor.

	Core2 Quad Q9100	Mobile Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Extreme X9100	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	44 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P9700	Mobile Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	28 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Extreme X7900	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	44 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Extreme X9000	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	44 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P9600	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P9600	Mobile Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P7550	Mobile Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P7570	Mobile Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T4500	Mobile Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T6670	Mobile Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P7450	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo P7370	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T6600	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T4400	Mobile Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T4300	Mobile Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T6570	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T6500	Mobile Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T6400	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T4200	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5600	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	34 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5550	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5800	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5470	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5450	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5250	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5300	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	34 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5500	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	34 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo T5270	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core Duo T2450	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron 900	Mobile Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	1 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.2 GHz Clock		1 Cores	1 Threads
	Core Duo T2350	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T2130	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core Duo T2250	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium T2080	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron 560	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	1 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock		1 Cores	1 Threads
	Pentium T2060	Mobile Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	31 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron 540	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.9 GHz Clock	1 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	30 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.9 GHz Clock		1 Cores	1 Threads
	Celeron 530	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	1 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	27 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		1 Cores	1 Threads
	Core Solo T1300	Mobile Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	PGA478 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	1 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	27 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock		1 Cores	1 Threads

Calculators

• Bottleneck Calculator
• Game Bottleneck Calculator
• FPS Calculator

Processor
Required

Please select processor

Graphic card
Required

Please select graphic card

Purpose
Required

General Tasks

Processor Intense Tasks

Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Please select purpose General Tasks Processor Intense Tasks Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Video game
Required

Please select video game

Screen resolution
Required

Please select screen resolution

Proceed to Calculation

Proceed to Calculation