Bottleneck Calculator

Processors that will work best with Quadro K6000 with FCLGA2011 socket

Chart below shows dependence on processor score in bottleneck calculation with NVIDIA Quadro K6000 graphic card for Graphic Card Intense Tasks.

We don't recommend you to downgrade your processor if you physically own it because there is no good reason to replace current processor with weaker one. Here is list of processors that will best work with your NVIDIA Quadro K6000 graphic card. This processors with NVIDIA Quadro K6000 will have less bottleneck than with your current Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 processor.

	Core i7-4820K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-2697 v2	Server Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	12 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.7 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	12 Cores	24 Threads
	Xeon E5-2687W v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.4 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E5-2680 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	10 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	115 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.8 GHz Clock	3.6 GHz Turbo Clock	10 Cores	20 Threads
	Xeon E5-2670 v2	Server Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	10 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	115 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.5 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	10 Cores	20 Threads
	Xeon E5-2650 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.6 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E5-2643 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Xeon E5-1650 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Xeon E5-2630 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.6 GHz Clock	3.1 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Xeon E5-2650L v2	Server Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	10 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	70 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		1.7 GHz Clock	2.1 GHz Turbo Clock	10 Cores	20 Threads
	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		3.7 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-2620 v2	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Compare Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
Bottleneck calculation Compare		2.1 GHz Clock	2.6 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads

Calculators

• Bottleneck Calculator
• Game Bottleneck Calculator
• FPS Calculator

Processor
Required

Please select processor

Graphic card
Required

Please select graphic card

Purpose
Required

General Tasks

Processor Intense Tasks

Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Please select purpose General Tasks Processor Intense Tasks Graphic Card Intense Tasks

Video game
Required

Please select video game

Screen resolution
Required

Please select screen resolution

Proceed to Calculation

Proceed to Calculation