Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Quad Q9650
versus
Intel logo Celeron J4025

Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 logo Intel Celeron J4025 logo
General information Core2 Quad Q9650 Celeron J4025
Launched Q4 2008 Q1 2020
Used in Desktop Desktop
Factory Intel Intel
Socket LGA775 FCBGA1090
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 2 GHz 33.3 %
Cores 4 0 % 2 50 %
Threads 4 0 % 2 50 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 W 0 % 10 W 89.5 %
Performance Core2 Quad Q9650 Celeron J4025
Overall Score 35632 0 % 31536 11.5 %
Future Proof 10 % 86.7 % 75 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 1612 0 % 989 38.6 %
Single Thread Score 1274 0 % 1159.3 9 %
Encrypting Data 3453.2 MB/s 0 % 2125.2 MB/s 38.5 %
Compressing Data 50.5 MB/s 0 % 20 MB/s 60.5 %
String objects sorting 6797.2 thousand/s 0 % 2621.5 thousand/s 61.4 %
Prime numbers generation 19 millions/s 0 % 5 millions/s 73.6 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 11216.3 millions/s 0 % 5487.7 millions/s 51.1 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 6379.3 millions/s 0 % 2911.6 millions/s 54.4 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q9650, Celeron J4025.

Average frames per second Core2 Quad Q9650 Celeron J4025
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 60.3 FPS 48.2 FPS
High settings 96.4 FPS 77.2 FPS
Medium settings 120.5 FPS 96.5 FPS
Low settings 150.6 FPS 120.6 FPS
Difference 0 % 19.9 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Quad Q9650 Celeron J4025
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 113.1 FPS 105.8 FPS
High settings 180.9 FPS 169.3 FPS
Medium settings 226.1 FPS 211.6 FPS
Low settings 282.7 FPS 264.6 FPS
Difference 0 % 6.4 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors