Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Quad Q9000
versus
Intel logo Celeron G1610

Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 logo Intel Celeron G1610 logo
General information Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610
Launched Q1 2009 Q4 2012
Used in Mobile Desktop
Factory Intel Intel
Socket PGA478 FCLGA1155
Clock 2 GHz 23.1 % 2.6 GHz 0 %
Cores 4 0 % 2 50 %
Threads 4 0 % 2 50 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 W 18.2 % 55 W 0 %
Performance Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610
Overall Score 31864 0 % 31546 1 %
Future Proof 11 % 66.7 % 33 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 1031 0 % 990 4 %
Single Thread Score 882.6 36 % 1378.8 0 %
Encrypting Data 2212.8 MB/s 0 % 2109 MB/s 4.7 %
Compressing Data 33.1 MB/s 0 % 26 MB/s 21.7 %
String objects sorting 4643.6 thousand/s 0 % 3441.3 thousand/s 25.9 %
Prime numbers generation 8 millions/s 19.1 % 9.9 millions/s 0 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 7349.1 millions/s 0 % 5387.1 millions/s 26.7 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 3972.8 millions/s 0.6 % 3995.6 millions/s 0 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q9000, Celeron G1610.

Average frames per second Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 49.2 FPS 48.3 FPS
High settings 78.8 FPS 77.2 FPS
Medium settings 98.5 FPS 96.6 FPS
Low settings 123.1 FPS 120.7 FPS
Difference 0 % 1.9 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 106.4 FPS 105.8 FPS
High settings 170.3 FPS 169.4 FPS
Medium settings 212.8 FPS 211.7 FPS
Low settings 266.0 FPS 264.6 FPS
Difference 0 % 0.5 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors