Graphic cards

Quadro K3100M

About NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q4 2013 . It's using PCIe 3.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 680 MHz and 4096 MB (4GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Workstation devices and can consume up to 75 watts of power .

Component specifications

Workstation
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 3.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q4 2013
Launched

4096 MB
Memory

680 MHz
Core Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

75 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Overall Score 24213

Benchmark Score 5863

2D Benchmark Score 322.7

Future Proof 30%

Component performance

20.9 FPS
Average DirectX performance

48 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

8.9 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

18.8 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

7.9 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

882.9 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with Quadro K3100M on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	A6-3650	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q8400	Desktop Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3258	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i3-2125	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X4 820	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3260	Desktop Used in	Q2 2015 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G2140	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q6700	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	105 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G3900T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched		2.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X4 B25	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q9400	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X4 630	Desktop Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3430	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	54 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X4 910e	Desktop Used in	Q2 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q9505	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Extreme Q6800	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X4 631	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G5905T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2021 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X4 B93	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-3670	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3450	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A8-3820	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock	2.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G3900	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6-7480	Desktop Used in	Q2 2019 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q8300	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X3 450	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9600B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X3 445	Desktop Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9750	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3260T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i3-2100	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-3620	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock	2.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-2105	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X3 455	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Athlon 5370	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	AM1 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-9500	Desktop Used in	Q4 2016 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 9950	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G2120	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G3220	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	54 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	PRO A6-8570	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Celeron G1850	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	54 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Extreme Q9300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	PGA478 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3230	Server Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3330	Server Used in	Q2 2010 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon L5420	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	50 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5462	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3323	Server Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5345	Server Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3220	Server Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	105 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon L5410	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	50 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can run games with frames per second ranging from 45.9 FPS up to 138.7 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 45.9 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 82.6 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 99.1 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 138.7 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA Quadro K3100M graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can achieve from 31.7 FPS up to 143.6 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can achieve from 31.7 FPS up to 47.5 FPS , with average around 39.6 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can achieve from 57.0 FPS up to 85.5 FPS , with average around 71.2 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can achieve from 68.4 FPS up to 102.6 FPS , with average around 85.4 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA Quadro K3100M can achieve from 95.8 FPS up to 143.6 FPS , with average around 119.6 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	FirePro V7900	Workstation Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	725 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		725 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K620	Workstation Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon Pro	Workstation Used in	Q3 2021 Launched				Compare

Compare
	FirePro M6100	Workstation Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	FirePro 3D V8800	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	825 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		825 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	208 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro M5100	Workstation Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	Quadro 5000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	405 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		405 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon Pro WX 3100	Workstation Used in	Q3 2017 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1219 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1219 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	50 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K4000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro 5000	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	152 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon) & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

Quadro K3100M

About NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Component specifications

Component performance

Compatible processors

A6-3650

Core2 Quad Q8400

Pentium G3258

Core i3-2125

Phenom II X4 820

Pentium G3260

Pentium G2140

Core2 Quad Q6700

Celeron G3900T

Phenom II X4 B25

Core2 Quad Q9400

Athlon II X4 630

Pentium G3430

Phenom II X4 910e

Core2 Quad Q9505

Core2 Extreme Q6800

Athlon II X4 631

Celeron G5905T

Phenom II X4 B93

A6-3670

Pentium G3450

A8-3820

Celeron G3900

A6-7480

Core2 Quad Q8300

Athlon II X3 450

Phenom 9600B

Athlon II X3 445

Phenom 9750

Pentium G3260T

Core i3-2100

A6-3620

Core i3-2105

Athlon II X3 455

Athlon 5370

A6-9500

Phenom 9950

Pentium G2120

Pentium G3220

PRO A6-8570

Celeron G1850

Core2 Extreme Q9300

Xeon X3230

Xeon X3330

Xeon L5420

Xeon E5462

Xeon X3323

Xeon E5345

Xeon X3220

Xeon L5410

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

FirePro V7900

Quadro K620

Radeon Pro

FirePro M6100

FirePro 3D V8800

FirePro M5100

Quadro 5000M

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator