Graphic cards

Quadro 5000M

About NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q4 2010 . It's using PCIe 2.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 405 MHz and 2048 MB (2GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Workstation devices and can consume up to 100 watts of power .

Component specifications

Workstation
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 2.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q4 2010
Launched

2048 MB
Memory

405 MHz
Core Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

100 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Overall Score 23061

Benchmark Score 5318

2D Benchmark Score 425.6

Future Proof 10%

Predicted component performance

15.6 FPS
Average DirectX performance

23.1 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

12.6 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

19.1 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

7.4 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

1281 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with Quadro 5000M on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	A6-7480	Desktop Used in	Q2 2019 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 450	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9600B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X3 445	Desktop Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9750	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G3260T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i3-2100	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-3620	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock	2.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-2105	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X3 455	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Athlon 5370	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	AM1 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-9500	Desktop Used in	Q4 2016 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i3-550	Desktop Used in	Q2 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-6400B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Pentium G2010	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6-7400K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G3240T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G1820T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	PRO A4-8350B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	PRO A6-8570E	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched		3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Athlon II X3 435	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	A6-3600	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock	2.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom 9550	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A9-9430	Desktop Used in	Q4 2017 Launched		3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	PRO A6-9500E	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	AM4 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Pentium G2020	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6 PRO-7400B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-560	Desktop Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G1630	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G1820	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 440	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9650	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom 9850	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G2030	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G3250T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2015 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X3 B75	Desktop Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Celeron G1840	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	PRO A6-9500	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Phenom II X4 910	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q8200	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon 5350	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	AM1 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X4 600e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-7470K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q6600	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	105 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-540	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-3500	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock	2.4 GHz Turbo Clock	3 Cores	3 Threads
	Xeon X3323	Server Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5345	Server Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5405	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon L5408	Server Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	40 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can run games with frames per second ranging from 42.9 FPS up to 129.7 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 42.9 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 77.2 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 92.7 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 129.7 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA Quadro 5000M graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can achieve from 30.1 FPS up to 136.4 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can achieve from 30.1 FPS up to 45.1 FPS , with average around 37.6 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can achieve from 54.1 FPS up to 81.2 FPS , with average around 67.6 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can achieve from 64.9 FPS up to 97.4 FPS , with average around 81.1 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA Quadro 5000M can achieve from 90.9 FPS up to 136.4 FPS , with average around 113.6 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	FirePro M5100	Workstation Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	FirePro M6100	Workstation Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	Quadro K4000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro 5000	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	152 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K620	Workstation Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro 3D V7800	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	138 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K3100M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	680 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		680 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro V7900	Workstation Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	725 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		725 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon Pro	Workstation Used in	Q3 2021 Launched				Compare

Compare
	Quadro 5010M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	450 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		450 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon) & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

Quadro 5000M

About NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Component specifications

Predicted component performance

Compatible processors

A6-7480

Athlon II X3 450

Phenom 9600B

Athlon II X3 445

Phenom 9750

Pentium G3260T

Core i3-2100

A6-3620

Core i3-2105

Athlon II X3 455

Athlon 5370

A6-9500

Core i3-550

A6-6400B

Pentium G2010

A6-7400K

Pentium G3240T

Celeron G1820T

PRO A4-8350B

PRO A6-8570E

Athlon II X3 435

A6-3600

Phenom 9550

A9-9430

PRO A6-9500E

Pentium G2020

A6 PRO-7400B

Core i3-560

Celeron G1630

Celeron G1820

Athlon II X3 440

Phenom 9650

Phenom 9850

Pentium G2030

Pentium G3250T

Phenom II X3 B75

Celeron G1840

PRO A6-9500

Phenom II X4 910

Core2 Quad Q8200

Athlon 5350

Athlon II X4 600e

A6-7470K

Core2 Quad Q6600

Core i3-540

A6-3500

Xeon X3323

Xeon E5345

Xeon E5405

Xeon L5408

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

FirePro M5100

FirePro M6100

Quadro K4000M

Quadro 5000

Quadro K620

FirePro 3D V7800

Quadro K3100M

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator