Graphic cards

Quadro K4000M

About NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q4 2012 . It's using PCIe 3.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 600 MHz and 4096 MB (4GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Workstation devices and can consume up to 100 watts of power .

Component specifications

Workstation
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 3.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q4 2012
Launched

4096 MB
Memory

600 MHz
Core Clock

2800 MHz
Effective Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

100 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

1
Cooling Fans

1
Case Slots

Overall Score 22500

Benchmark Score 5062

2D Benchmark Score 306.1

Future Proof 23%

Component performance

17.2 FPS
Average DirectX performance

39 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

8 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

15.9 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

6 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

712.3 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with Quadro K4000M on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	Core i3-550	Desktop Used in	Q2 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-6400B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Pentium G2010	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6-7400K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G3240T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G1820T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	PRO A4-8350B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	PRO A6-8570E	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched		3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Athlon II X3 435	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	A6-3600	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock	2.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom 9550	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	A9-9430	Desktop Used in	Q4 2017 Launched		3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	PRO A6-9500E	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	AM4 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Pentium G2020	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6 PRO-7400B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-560	Desktop Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G1630	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G1820	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	53 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 440	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom 9650	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom 9850	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-540	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-3500	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	FM1 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock	2.4 GHz Turbo Clock	3 Cores	3 Threads
	Pentium G2020T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A4-6300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G850	Desktop Used in	Q2 2011 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 415e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom II X2 565	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	AM2+ Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 8750	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom II X3 700e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	A6-5400B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-4020Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	BGA1168 Socket	1.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium J3710	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched		1.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	6 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.6 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom 8600B	Desktop Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Pentium G860	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i5-4300Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	BGA1168 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.3 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	4 Threads
	A4 PRO-7300B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched		3.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.8 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-2100T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-530	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-6400K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X4 900e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i5-4202Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCBGA1168 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron J4025	Desktop Used in	Q1 2020 Launched	FCBGA1090 Socket	2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	10 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2 GHz Clock	2.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G870	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i5-4302Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCBGA1168 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.3 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G1610	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Xeon E5405	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Opteron 1354	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5320	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	1.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.9 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Opteron X3216	Server Used in	Q3 2017 Launched		1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	15 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	3 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can run games with frames per second ranging from 41.2 FPS up to 124.6 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 41.2 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 74.2 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 89.0 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 124.6 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA Quadro K4000M graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can achieve from 29.2 FPS up to 132.2 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can achieve from 29.2 FPS up to 43.7 FPS , with average around 36.4 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can achieve from 52.5 FPS up to 78.7 FPS , with average around 65.6 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can achieve from 63.0 FPS up to 94.4 FPS , with average around 78.7 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA Quadro K4000M can achieve from 88.2 FPS up to 132.2 FPS , with average around 110.2 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	Quadro 5000	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	152 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro 3D V7800	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	138 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro 5000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	405 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		405 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro M5100	Workstation Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		775 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	FirePro M6100	Workstation Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1075 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	Quadro 5010M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	450 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		450 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K620	Workstation Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1000 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K3100M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	680 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		680 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro W600	Workstation Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	750 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		750 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K3000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	654 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		654 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon) & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

Quadro K4000M

About NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Component specifications

Component performance

Compatible processors

Core i3-550

A6-6400B

Pentium G2010

A6-7400K

Pentium G3240T

Celeron G1820T

PRO A4-8350B

PRO A6-8570E

Athlon II X3 435

A6-3600

Phenom 9550

A9-9430

PRO A6-9500E

Pentium G2020

A6 PRO-7400B

Core i3-560

Celeron G1630

Celeron G1820

Athlon II X3 440

Phenom 9650

Phenom 9850

Core i3-540

A6-3500

Pentium G2020T

A4-6300

Pentium G850

Athlon II X3 415e

Phenom II X2 565

Phenom 8750

Phenom II X3 700e

A6-5400B

Core i3-4020Y

Pentium J3710

Phenom 8600B

Pentium G860

Core i5-4300Y

A4 PRO-7300B

Core i3-2100T

Core i3-530

A6-6400K

Phenom II X4 900e

Core i5-4202Y

Celeron J4025

Pentium G870

Core i5-4302Y

Celeron G1610

Xeon E5405

Opteron 1354

Xeon E5320

Opteron X3216

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

Quadro 5000

FirePro 3D V7800

Quadro 5000M

FirePro M5100

FirePro M6100

Quadro 5010M

Quadro K620

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator