Graphic cards

GeForce GTX 680

About NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q3 2012 . It's using PCIe 3.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 1006 MHz and 4096 MB (4GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Desktop devices and can consume up to 195 watts of power .

Component specifications

Desktop
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 3.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q3 2012
Launched

2048 - 4096 MB
Memory

1006 - 1202 MHz
Core Clock

6000 - 6608 MHz
Effective Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

195 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

254 - 303 mm
Length

1 - 5
Cooling Fans

2 - 3
Case Slots

4-way
SLI

G-Sync
Frame Sync

Overall Score 37863

Benchmark Score 14336

2D Benchmark Score 535.1

Future Proof 21%

Component performance

45.2 FPS
Average DirectX performance

88.6 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

22 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

49.3 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

20.8 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

2613.1 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with GeForce GTX 680 on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	Core i3-10105F	Desktop Used in	Q1 2021 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-6700K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	LGA1151 Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		4 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 3350G	Desktop Used in	Q4 2020 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i3-10100F	Desktop Used in	Q4 2020 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-7700	Desktop Used in	Q4 2016 Launched	LGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i3-10100	Desktop Used in	Q2 2020 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 2400G	Desktop Used in	Q1 2018 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE	Desktop Used in	Q4 2019 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i5-9400T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2019 Launched	FCLGA1151-2 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	Core i7-3960X	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Core i7-3970X	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	Desktop Used in	Q2 2018 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i3-10105	Desktop Used in	Q2 2021 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 3400GE	Desktop Used in	Q2 2020 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-6700	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	LGA1151 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-4790K	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	88 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		4 GHz Clock	4.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 1400	Desktop Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i3-9350KF	Desktop Used in	Q2 2019 Launched	FCLGA1151-2 Socket	4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	91 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		4 GHz Clock	4.6 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i7-5775R	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-7700T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE	Desktop Used in	Q2 2018 Launched	AM4 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i7-5775C	Desktop Used in	Q2 2015 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Core i5-8500T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2018 Launched	FCLGA1151-2 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock	3.5 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	6 Threads
	Xeon E5-2670	Server Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	115 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E3-1270 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.8 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1280 v6	Server Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.9 GHz Clock	4.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1240 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1260L v5	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E-2314	Server Used in	Q1 2022 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock	4.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5-2665	Server Used in	Q2 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	115 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock	3.1 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E5-2470	Server Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	LGA1356 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock	3.1 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E3-1270 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1280 v5	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-1660	Server Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Xeon E3-1275 v5	Server Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon W-2123	Server Used in	Q4 2017 Launched	FCLGA2066 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	120 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon W-2223	Server Used in	Q2 2020 Launched	FCLGA2066 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	120 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-4650	Server Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E3-1240 v6	Server Used in	Q3 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	72 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-2630L v3	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	LGA2011-v3 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	55 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock	2.9 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E3-1245 v6	Server Used in	Q2 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon Gold 5122	Server Used in	Q4 2017 Launched	FCLGA3647 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	105 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon Silver 4108	Server Used in	Q1 2018 Launched	FCLGA3647 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	85 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock	3 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E5-2620 v3	Server Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	LGA2011-v3 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	6 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	85 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock	3.2 GHz Turbo Clock	6 Cores	12 Threads
	Xeon E5-2650L v2	Server Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA2011 Socket	1.7 GHz Clock	10 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	70 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.7 GHz Clock	2.1 GHz Turbo Clock	10 Cores	20 Threads
	Xeon E5-2640 v2	Server Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	2 GHz Clock	8 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2 GHz Clock	2.5 GHz Turbo Clock	8 Cores	16 Threads
	Xeon E-2224G	Server Used in	Q3 2019 Launched	FCLGA1151-2 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	71 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	4.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5-1630 v4	Server Used in	Q3 2016 Launched	FCLGA2011-3 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	140 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1545M v5	Server Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	FCBGA1440 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E3-1575M v5	Server Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	FCBGA1440 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can run games with frames per second ranging from 81.0 FPS up to 244.8 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 81.0 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 145.7 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 174.9 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 244.8 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can achieve from 50.3 FPS up to 228.2 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can achieve from 50.3 FPS up to 75.5 FPS , with average around 62.9 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can achieve from 90.5 FPS up to 135.8 FPS , with average around 113.2 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can achieve from 108.7 FPS up to 163.0 FPS , with average around 135.8 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 can achieve from 152.1 FPS up to 228.2 FPS , with average around 190.2 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	GeForce GTX 950	Desktop Used in	Q3 2015 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1024 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1024 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	90 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	GeForce GTX 770	Desktop Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1046 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1046 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	230 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon HD 7990	Desktop Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	950 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		950 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	375 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	GeForce GTX 690	Desktop Used in	Q2 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	915 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		915 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	300 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon R9 280X	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1000 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1000 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	250 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	GeForce GTX 670	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	915 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		915 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	170 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon R9 380	Desktop Used in	Q1 2015 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	918 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		918 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	190 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon HD 7970	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1000 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1000 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	250 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	GeForce GTX 760 Ti	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	915 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		915 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	170 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Radeon HD 8990	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	950 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		950 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	375 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 3060 & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

GeForce GTX 680

About NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Component specifications

Component performance

Compatible processors

Core i3-10105F

Core i7-6700K

Ryzen 5 3350G

Core i3-10100F

Core i7-7700

Core i3-10100

Ryzen 5 2400G

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Core i5-9400T

Core i7-3960X

Core i7-3970X

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

Core i3-10105

Ryzen 5 3400GE

Core i7-6700

Core i7-4790K

Ryzen 5 1400

Core i3-9350KF

Core i7-5775R

Core i7-7700T

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

Core i7-5775C

Core i5-8500T

Xeon E5-2670

Xeon E3-1270 v6

Xeon E3-1280 v6

Xeon E3-1240 v5

Xeon E3-1260L v5

Xeon E-2314

Xeon E5-2665

Xeon E5-2470

Xeon E3-1270 v5

Xeon E3-1280 v5

Xeon E5-1660

Xeon E3-1275 v5

Xeon W-2123

Xeon W-2223

Xeon E5-4650

Xeon E3-1240 v6

Xeon E5-2630L v3

Xeon E3-1245 v6

Xeon Gold 5122

Xeon Silver 4108

Xeon E5-2620 v3

Xeon E5-2650L v2

Xeon E5-2640 v2

Xeon E-2224G

Xeon E5-1630 v4

Xeon E3-1545M v5

Xeon E3-1575M v5

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

GeForce GTX 950

GeForce GTX 770

Radeon HD 7990

GeForce GTX 690

Radeon R9 280X

GeForce GTX 670

Radeon R9 380

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 3060
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce RTX 4090 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator