Graphic cards

Quadro 5010M

About NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q4 2011 . It's using PCIe 2.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 450 MHz and 4096 MB (4GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Workstation devices and can consume up to 100 watts of power .

Component specifications

Workstation
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 2.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q4 2011
Launched

4096 MB
Memory

450 MHz
Core Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

100 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Overall Score 21395

Benchmark Score 4577

2D Benchmark Score 314.1

Future Proof 16%

Component performance

27.5 FPS
Average DirectX performance

46.8 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

19 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

44.2 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

0 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

690.4 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with Quadro 5010M on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	A4-6300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G2020T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G850	Desktop Used in	Q2 2011 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 415e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom II X2 565	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	AM2+ Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 8750	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Phenom II X3 700e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	A6-5400B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-4020Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	BGA1168 Socket	1.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium J3710	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched		1.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	6 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.6 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G860	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	FCLGA1155 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 8600B	Desktop Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Core i5-4300Y	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	BGA1168 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.3 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	4 Threads
	A4 PRO-7300B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched		3.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.8 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Core i3-2100T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-530	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	A6-6400K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.9 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X4 900e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium J2900	Desktop Used in	Q1 2014 Launched	FCBGA1170 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	10 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock	2.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G550	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo E8500	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A6-5400K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X2 265	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron J3160	Desktop Used in	Q2 2016 Launched	BGA1170 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	6 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	2.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A4-4020	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X2 B28	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 9100e	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X2 270	Desktop Used in	Q3 2011 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G6960	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom II X2 555	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	AM2+ Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon X2 340	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.6 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 400e	Desktop Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Pentium G630	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A4-6300B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.7 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon II X3 405e	Desktop Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	3 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		3 Cores	3 Threads
	Pentium G640	Desktop Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G1610T	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core i3-4010Y	Desktop Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	BGA1168 Socket	1.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	12 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X2 570	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A4-5300	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Duo E8600	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Celeron G555	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Athlon 5150	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	AM1 Socket	1.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	25 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G645	Desktop Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Phenom 9150e	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Opteron 1354	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5320	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	1.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.9 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Opteron X3216	Server Used in	Q3 2017 Launched		1.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	15 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.6 GHz Clock	3 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores
	Xeon X3210	Server Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	105 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.1 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E3120	Server Used in	Q1 2010 Launched	LGA775 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can run games with frames per second ranging from 38.7 FPS up to 117.0 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 38.7 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 69.7 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 83.6 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 117.0 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA Quadro 5010M graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can achieve from 27.7 FPS up to 125.5 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can achieve from 27.7 FPS up to 41.5 FPS , with average around 34.6 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can achieve from 49.8 FPS up to 74.7 FPS , with average around 62.3 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can achieve from 59.8 FPS up to 89.6 FPS , with average around 74.7 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA Quadro 5010M can achieve from 83.7 FPS up to 125.5 FPS , with average around 104.6 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	FirePro 3D V7800	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		700 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	138 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro W600	Workstation Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	750 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		750 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K3000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	654 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		654 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro P400	Workstation Used in	Q3 2017 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1070 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1070 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	30 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro 5000	Workstation Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		513 MHz Core Clock	2560 MB Memory	152 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro M4000	Workstation Used in	Q3 2012 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	600 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		600 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory
	Quadro K4000M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		600 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K2000	Workstation Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	954 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		954 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K2000D	Workstation Used in	Q2 2013 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	954 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		954 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro W4100	Workstation Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	630 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		630 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	50 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon) & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

Quadro 5010M

About NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

Component specifications

Component performance

Compatible processors

A4-6300

Pentium G2020T

Pentium G850

Athlon II X3 415e

Phenom II X2 565

Phenom 8750

Phenom II X3 700e

A6-5400B

Core i3-4020Y

Pentium J3710

Pentium G860

Phenom 8600B

Core i5-4300Y

A4 PRO-7300B

Core i3-2100T

Core i3-530

A6-6400K

Phenom II X4 900e

Pentium J2900

Celeron G550

Core2 Duo E8500

A6-5400K

Athlon II X2 265

Celeron J3160

A4-4020

Athlon II X2 B28

Phenom 9100e

Athlon II X2 270

Pentium G6960

Phenom II X2 555

Athlon X2 340

Athlon II X3 400e

Pentium G630

A4-6300B

Athlon II X3 405e

Pentium G640

Celeron G1610T

Core i3-4010Y

Phenom II X2 570

A4-5300

Core2 Duo E8600

Celeron G555

Athlon 5150

Pentium G645

Phenom 9150e

Opteron 1354

Xeon E5320

Opteron X3216

Xeon X3210

Xeon E3120

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

FirePro 3D V7800

FirePro W600

Quadro K3000M

Quadro P400

Quadro 5000

FirePro M4000

Quadro K4000M

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator