Graphic cards

Quadro K5000M

About NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M is graphic card manufactured by NVIDIA and launched in Q3 2012 . It's using PCIe 3.0 x16 bus type. It has core clock of 706 MHz and 4096 MB (4GB) of memory . It supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.5 . This graphic card is used in Workstation devices and can consume up to 100 watts of power .

Component specifications

Workstation
Used in

NVIDIA
Factory

PCIe 3.0 x16
Motherboard Bus

Q3 2012
Launched

4096 MB
Memory

706 MHz
Core Clock

DirectX 11
DirectX

OpenGL 4.5
OpenGL

100 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Overall Score 26665

Benchmark Score 7110

2D Benchmark Score 350.4

Future Proof 21%

Component performance

22.9 FPS
Average DirectX performance

44.7 FPS
DirectX 9 performance

12.1 FPS
DirectX 10 performance

25.1 FPS
DirectX 11 performance

9.9 FPS
DirectX 12 performance

1192.6 operations/s
Graphic card computing

Compatible processors

Processors that best works with Quadro K5000M on 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution in general tasks.

	Celeron J4105	Desktop Used in	Q1 2018 Launched	FCBGA1090 Socket	1.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	10 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.5 GHz Clock	2.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i3-4150T	Desktop Used in	Q3 2014 Launched	FCLGA1150 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	FX-770K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Core i5-2500T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2011 Launched	LGA1155 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i7-940	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock	3.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Athlon X4 760K	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.8 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G5905	Desktop Used in	Q3 2020 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	58 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	FX-4100	Desktop Used in	Q4 2011 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A8-5500B	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Core i5-680	Desktop Used in	Q2 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	73 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	2 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X4 965	Desktop Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon X4 750	Desktop Used in	Q1 2015 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Core i5-760	Desktop Used in	Q3 2010 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock	3.3 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon X4 740	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock	3.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron G5900	Desktop Used in	Q2 2020 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	58 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	FX-4130	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	AM3+ Socket	3.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.8 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Celeron J4115	Desktop Used in	Q1 2020 Launched		1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock	2.5 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core2 Extreme X9770	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	136 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X4 B65	Desktop Used in	Q1 2011 Launched	AM2+ Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4520	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A10-5700	Desktop Used in	Q2 2012 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Pentium G4500	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A8-6500	Desktop Used in	Q3 2013 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Core i7-920	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock	2.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Celeron G5925	Desktop Used in	Q2 2021 Launched	FCLGA1200 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	58 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	A8-5600K	Desktop Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	3.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	A8-6500B	Desktop Used in	Q2 2014 Launched	FM2 Socket	3.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.5 GHz Clock	4.1 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Core i3-4130T	Desktop Used in	Q1 2013 Launched	LGA1150 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	4 Threads
	PRO A10-8750B	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FM2+ Socket	3.6 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	65 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.6 GHz Clock	4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores
	Celeron G3950	Desktop Used in	Q1 2017 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	3 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	51 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Pentium G4400T	Desktop Used in	Q4 2015 Launched	FCLGA1151 Socket	2.9 GHz Clock	2 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	35 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.9 GHz Clock		2 Cores	2 Threads
	Core2 Quad Q9550	Desktop Used in	Q4 2008 Launched	LGA775 Socket	2.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X4 940	Desktop Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	AM2+ Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	125 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Phenom II X4 960T	Desktop Used in	Q2 2011 Launched	AM3 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock	3.4 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	4 Threads
	Athlon II X4 645	Desktop Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	AM3 Socket	3.1 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.1 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X5492	Server Used in	Q1 2008 Launched	LGA771 Socket	3.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X5470	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	3.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	120 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon W3520	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	130 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock	2.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-2407	Server Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA1356 Socket	2.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5530	Server Used in	Q2 2009 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock	2.7 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5607	Server Used in	Q2 2011 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5-2603 v2	Server Used in	Q4 2014 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X5482	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	3.2 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3.2 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3440	Server Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock	2.9 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5540	Server Used in	Q3 2009 Launched	LGA1366 Socket	2.5 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.5 GHz Clock	2.8 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon E5-2609	Server Used in	Q2 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	2.4 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.4 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon X3450	Server Used in	Q4 2009 Launched	LGA1156 Socket	2.7 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	95 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		2.7 GHz Clock	3.2 GHz Turbo Clock	4 Cores	8 Threads
	Xeon X5365	Server Used in	Q1 2009 Launched	LGA771 Socket	3 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	150 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		3 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5-2603	Server Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA2011 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads
	Xeon E5-2403	Server Used in	Q1 2012 Launched	LGA1356 Socket	1.8 GHz Clock	4 Cores	Bottleneck calculation	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Bottleneck calculation		1.8 GHz Clock		4 Cores	4 Threads

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Average frames per second

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can run games with frames per second ranging from 52.3 FPS up to 158.2 FPS depending on game settings with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings this processor can achieve on average around 52.3 FPS .
On high settings this processor can achieve on average around 94.2 FPS .
On medium settings this processor can achieve on average around 113.0 FPS .
On low settings this processor can achieve on average around 158.2 FPS .

Grand Theft Auto V

Frames per second calculator

Game Grand Theft Auto V

Screen Resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p))

Graphic card NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Number of frames per second for NVIDIA Quadro K5000M graphic card in Grand Theft Auto V game with 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution. When there isn't bottleneck in configuration, NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can achieve from 34.9 FPS up to 158.4 FPS frames per second while running Grand Theft Auto V game on 1920 x 1080 (FHD (1080p)) resolution.

On ultra settings NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can achieve from 34.9 FPS up to 52.4 FPS , with average around 43.6 FPS .
On high settings NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can achieve from 62.9 FPS up to 94.3 FPS , with average around 78.6 FPS .
On medium settings NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can achieve from 75.4 FPS up to 113.2 FPS , with average around 94.3 FPS .
On low settings NVIDIA Quadro K5000M can achieve from 105.6 FPS up to 158.4 FPS , with average around 132.0 FPS .

Similar graphic cards

	GRID K2	Workstation Used in	Q3 2013 Launched				Compare

Compare
	Quadro K4100M	Workstation Used in	Q4 2013 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	706 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		706 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	100 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro V9800	Workstation Used in	Q1 2016 Launched			4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare			4096 MB Memory	225 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro K4000	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	810 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		810 MHz Core Clock	3072 MB Memory	80 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	Quadro 6000	Workstation Used in	Q4 2010 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	574 MHz Core Clock	6144 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		574 MHz Core Clock	6144 MB Memory	204 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro W4300	Workstation Used in	Q1 2016 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	930 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		930 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	50 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	GRID K280Q	Workstation Used in	Q1 2015 Launched				Compare

Compare
	FirePro M6100 FireGL V	Workstation Used in	Q1 2017 Launched				Compare

Compare
	Quadro K1200	Workstation Used in	Q2 2015 Launched	PCIe 2.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	1058 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		1058 MHz Core Clock	4096 MB Memory	45 W Thermal Design Power TDP
	FirePro W5000	Workstation Used in	Q4 2012 Launched	PCIe 3.0 x16 Motherboard Bus	825 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	Compare

Compare		825 MHz Core Clock	2048 MB Memory	75 W Thermal Design Power TDP

Note: We may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through the links to participating retailers on this site.

Graphic cards

Most popular graphic cards

Popular graphic card comparisons

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon) & Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon) & GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Compare graphic cards

Selected graphic cards

Quadro K5000M

About NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Component specifications

Component performance

Compatible processors

Celeron J4105

Core i3-4150T

FX-770K

Core i5-2500T

Core i7-940

Athlon X4 760K

Celeron G5905

FX-4100

A8-5500B

Core i5-680

Phenom II X4 965

Athlon X4 750

Core i5-760

Athlon X4 740

Celeron G5900

FX-4130

Celeron J4115

Core2 Extreme X9770

Phenom II X4 B65

Pentium G4520

A10-5700

Pentium G4500

A8-6500

Core i7-920

Celeron G5925

A8-5600K

A8-6500B

Core i3-4130T

PRO A10-8750B

Celeron G3950

Pentium G4400T

Core2 Quad Q9550

Phenom II X4 940

Phenom II X4 960T

Athlon II X4 645

Xeon X5492

Xeon X5470

Xeon W3520

Xeon E5-2407

Xeon E5530

Xeon E5607

Xeon E5-2603 v2

Xeon X5482

Xeon X3440

Xeon E5540

Xeon E5-2609

Xeon X3450

Xeon X5365

Xeon E5-2603

Xeon E5-2403

Average frames per second

Frames per second calculator Settings

Similar graphic cards

GRID K2

Quadro K4100M

FirePro V9800

Quadro K4000

Quadro 6000

FirePro W4300

GRID K280Q

GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)
&
Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Radeon RX 6600 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 3070 (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3060 (Amazon)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 3050 (Amazon)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (Amazon)
&
GeForce RTX 4060 (Amazon)

Frames per second calculator