Core2 Quad Q8300
Celeron E1500
|
|
|
| General information | Core2 Quad Q8300 | Celeron E1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q1 2009 | Q2 2009 |
| Used in | Desktop | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | Intel |
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Series Name | Intel Core 2 Quad | Intel Celeron |
| Core Family Name | Yorkfield | Conroe |
| Clock | 2.5 GHz 0 % | 2.2 GHz 12 % |
| Cores | 4 0 % | 2 50 % |
| Threads | 4 0 % | 2 50 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 W 0 % | 65 W 31.6 % |
| Lithography | 45 nm 30.8 % | 65 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
4 × 32 kB Instruction
4 × 32 kB Data |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
2 × 2 MB
|
1 × 512 kB
|
| ECC Supported | No | No |
| Multithreading Supported | No | No |
| Performance | Core2 Quad Q8300 | Celeron E1500 |
| Overall Score | 33230 0 % | 25223 24.1 % |
| Future Proof | 11 % 15.4 % | 13 % 0 % |
| Benchmark Score | 1219 0 % | 405 66.8 % |
| Single Thread Score | 1053.6 0 % | 764.8 27.4 % |
| Encrypting Data | 2767.7 MB/s 0 % | 929.7 MB/s 66.4 % |
| Compressing Data | 40.6 MB/s 0 % | 13.1 MB/s 67.8 % |
| String objects sorting | 5520.5 thousand/s 0 % | 2412.8 thousand/s 56.3 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 7 millions/s 0 % | 2 millions/s 71.7 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 9072.9 millions/s 0 % | 1771.1 millions/s 80.5 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 5157.2 millions/s 0 % | 1363.3 millions/s 73.6 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q8300, Celeron E1500.
| Average frames per second | Core2 Quad Q8300 | Celeron E1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 53.5 FPS | 33.3 FPS |
| High settings | 85.6 FPS | 53.3 FPS |
| Medium settings | 107.0 FPS | 66.6 FPS |
| Low settings | 133.7 FPS | 83.3 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 37.7 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Core2 Quad Q8300 | Celeron E1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 109.1 FPS | 95.0 FPS |
| High settings | 174.6 FPS | 151.9 FPS |
| Medium settings | 218.2 FPS | 189.9 FPS |
| Low settings | 272.8 FPS | 237.4 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 13 % |
