Celeron G5925
Athlon II X2 220
|
|
|
| General information | Celeron G5925 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q2 2021 | Q2 2010 |
| Used in | Desktop | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | AMD |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | AM3 |
| Series Name | Intel Celeron | AMD Athlon II X2 |
| Core Family Name | Comet Lake | Regor |
| Clock | 3.6 GHz 0 % | 2.8 GHz 22.2 % |
| Cores | 2 0 % | 2 0 % |
| Threads | 2 0 % | 2 0 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 W 10.8 % | 65 W 0 % |
| Lithography | 14 nm 68.9 % | 45 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
2 × 64 kB Instruction
2 × 64 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
2 × 256 kB
|
2 × 512 kB
|
| ECC Supported | No | No |
| Multithreading Supported | No | No |
| Performance | Celeron G5925 | Athlon II X2 220 |
| Overall Score | 36840 0 % | 28566 22.5 % |
| Future Proof | 82 % 0 % | 18 % 78 % |
| Benchmark Score | 1842 0 % | 666 63.8 % |
| Single Thread Score | 2229 0 % | 1084.6 51.3 % |
| Encrypting Data | 4209.8 MB/s 0 % | 1523.5 MB/s 63.8 % |
| Compressing Data | 41.5 MB/s 0 % | 22.5 MB/s 45.9 % |
| String objects sorting | 5001.8 thousand/s 0 % | 2957 thousand/s 40.9 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 19.9 millions/s 0 % | 5 millions/s 74.8 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 7657.1 millions/s 0 % | 3055.9 millions/s 60.1 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 6987.5 millions/s 0 % | 2251.2 millions/s 67.8 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Celeron G5925, Athlon II X2 220.
| Average frames per second | Celeron G5925 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 64.2 FPS | 40.1 FPS |
| High settings | 102.7 FPS | 64.2 FPS |
| Medium settings | 128.4 FPS | 80.2 FPS |
| Low settings | 160.5 FPS | 100.3 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 37.5 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Celeron G5925 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 115.5 FPS | 101.0 FPS |
| High settings | 184.8 FPS | 161.5 FPS |
| Medium settings | 231.0 FPS | 201.9 FPS |
| Low settings | 288.7 FPS | 252.4 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 12.6 % |
