Core2 Duo E8200
Athlon II X2 250u
|
|
|
| General information | Core2 Duo E8200 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q4 2008 | Q1 2010 |
| Used in | Desktop | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | AMD |
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Series Name | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Athlon II X2 |
| Core Family Name | Wolfdale | Regor |
| Clock | 2.7 GHz 0 % | 1.6 GHz 40.7 % |
| Cores | 2 0 % | 2 0 % |
| Threads | 2 0 % | 2 0 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 W 0 % | 25 W 61.5 % |
| Lithography | 45 nm 0 % | 45 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
2 × 64 kB Instruction
2 × 64 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
1 × 6 MB
|
2 × 1 MB
|
| ECC Supported | No | No |
| Multithreading Supported | No | No |
| Performance | Core2 Duo E8200 | Athlon II X2 250u |
| Overall Score | 29092 0 % | 24925 14.3 % |
| Future Proof | 10 % 41.2 % | 17 % 0 % |
| Benchmark Score | 716 0 % | 386 46.1 % |
| Single Thread Score | 1136 0 % | 633.5 44.2 % |
| Encrypting Data | 1630.7 MB/s 0 % | 883 MB/s 45.8 % |
| Compressing Data | 22.3 MB/s 0 % | 12.6 MB/s 43.3 % |
| String objects sorting | 3129.4 thousand/s 0 % | 1693.2 thousand/s 45.9 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 9 millions/s 0 % | 3 millions/s 66.6 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 4573.8 millions/s 0 % | 1748.5 millions/s 61.8 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 2848.4 millions/s 0 % | 1191 millions/s 58.2 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Duo E8200, Athlon II X2 250u.
| Average frames per second | Core2 Duo E8200 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 41.4 FPS | 32.8 FPS |
| High settings | 66.3 FPS | 52.5 FPS |
| Medium settings | 82.9 FPS | 65.6 FPS |
| Low settings | 103.6 FPS | 82.0 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 20.8 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Core2 Duo E8200 | Athlon II X2 250u |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 101.9 FPS | 94.5 FPS |
| High settings | 163.0 FPS | 151.3 FPS |
| Medium settings | 203.8 FPS | 189.1 FPS |
| Low settings | 254.7 FPS | 236.3 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 7.2 % |
