General information | Core i9-10900K | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Launched | Q2 2020 | Q4 2014 |
Used in | Desktop | Server |
Factory | Intel | Intel |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | LGA2011-v3 |
Series Name | Intel Core i9 | Intel Xeon E5 |
Core Family Name | Comet Lake | Haswell-EP |
Clock | 3.7 GHz 0 % | 2.4 GHz 35.1 % |
Turbo Clock | 5.3 GHz 0 % | 3.2 GHz 39.6 % |
Cores | 10 0 % | 6 40 % |
Threads | 20 0 % | 12 40 % |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 W 0 % | 85 W 32 % |
Lithography | 14 nm 36.4 % | 22 nm 0 % |
L1 Cache |
10 × 32 kB Instruction
10 × 32 kB Data |
6 × 32 kB Instruction
6 × 32 kB Data |
L2 Cache |
10 × 256 kB
|
6 × 256 kB
|
L3 Cache |
1 × 20 MB
|
1 × 15 MB
|
ECC Supported | No | Yes |
Multithreading Supported | Yes | Yes |
Performance | Core i9-10900K | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
Overall Score | 62052 0 % | 47399 23.6 % |
Future Proof | 76 % 0 % | 44 % 42.1 % |
Benchmark Score | 14826 0 % | 5047 66 % |
Single Thread Score | 3142.3 0 % | 1691 46.2 % |
Encrypting Data | 8172.6 MB/s 0 % | 2181.8 MB/s 73.3 % |
Compressing Data | 373 MB/s 0 % | 118.1 MB/s 68.3 % |
String objects sorting | 46762 thousand/s 0 % | 16753 thousand/s 64.2 % |
Prime numbers generation | 63.6 millions/s 0 % | 36.3 millions/s 42.9 % |
Mathemathic operations (integer) | 86329.2 millions/s 0 % | 28777.4 millions/s 66.7 % |
Mathemathic operations (float) | 53031.3 millions/s 0 % | 14352.9 millions/s 72.9 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core i9-10900K, Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Average frames per second | Core i9-10900K | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
Ultra settings | 139.0 FPS | 95.5 FPS |
High settings | 222.4 FPS | 152.8 FPS |
Medium settings | 278.0 FPS | 191.0 FPS |
Low settings | 347.5 FPS | 238.8 FPS |
Difference | 0 % | 31.3 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
Grand Theft Auto V | Core i9-10900K | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
Ultra settings | 159.9 FPS | 134.1 FPS |
High settings | 255.8 FPS | 214.6 FPS |
Medium settings | 319.8 FPS | 268.3 FPS |
Low settings | 399.7 FPS | 335.3 FPS |
Difference | 0 % | 16.1 % |