Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Extreme X9000
versus
AMD logo GX-412HC

Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 logo AMD GX-412HC logo
General information Core2 Extreme X9000 GX-412HC
Launched Q1 2009 Q1 2015
Used in Mobile Mobile
Factory Intel AMD
Socket PGA478 FT3b
Clock 2.8 GHz 0 % 1.2 GHz 57.1 %
Cores 2 50 % 4 0 %
Threads 2 50 % 4 0 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 44 W 0 % 7 W 84.1 %
Performance Core2 Extreme X9000 GX-412HC
Overall Score 29036 0 % 28976 0.2 %
Future Proof 11 % 76.1 % 46 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 711 0 % 705 0.8 %
Single Thread Score 1091.4 0 % 410.3 62.4 %
Encrypting Data 1626 MB/s 0 % 1612.7 MB/s 0.8 %
Compressing Data 22.2 MB/s 0 % 17.7 MB/s 20.5 %
String objects sorting 3248.7 thousand/s 0 % 2413.8 thousand/s 25.7 %
Prime numbers generation 9 millions/s 0 % 4 millions/s 55.6 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 4447.6 millions/s 32.4 % 6581.4 millions/s 0 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 2622 millions/s 0 % 1549.8 millions/s 40.9 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Extreme X9000, GX-412HC.

Average frames per second Core2 Extreme X9000 GX-412HC
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 41.3 FPS 41.1 FPS
High settings 66.0 FPS 65.8 FPS
Medium settings 82.5 FPS 82.2 FPS
Low settings 103.2 FPS 102.8 FPS
Difference 0 % 0.4 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Extreme X9000 GX-412HC
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 101.6 FPS 101.5 FPS
High settings 162.5 FPS 162.4 FPS
Medium settings 203.2 FPS 203.0 FPS
Low settings 254.0 FPS 253.7 FPS
Difference 0 % 0.1 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors