Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Quad Q9500
versus
Intel logo Celeron E3200

Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 logo Intel Celeron E3200 logo
General information Core2 Quad Q9500 Celeron E3200
Launched Q2 2010 Q3 2009
Used in Desktop Desktop
Factory Intel Intel
Socket LGA775 LGA775
Clock 2.8 GHz 0 % 2.4 GHz 14.3 %
Cores 4 0 % 2 50 %
Threads 4 0 % 2 50 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 W 0 % 65 W 31.6 %
Performance Core2 Quad Q9500 Celeron E3200
Overall Score 34629 0 % 27139 21.6 %
Future Proof 18 % 0 % 14 % 22.2 %
Benchmark Score 1438 0 % 542 62.3 %
Single Thread Score 1215 0 % 963.2 20.7 %
Encrypting Data 3290 MB/s 0 % 1243.6 MB/s 62.2 %
Compressing Data 48.5 MB/s 0 % 18.2 MB/s 62.5 %
String objects sorting 6556.6 thousand/s 0 % 2521.5 thousand/s 61.5 %
Prime numbers generation 9 millions/s 0 % 3 millions/s 66.9 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 10685.3 millions/s 0 % 3798.4 millions/s 64.5 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 5934.9 millions/s 0 % 2459.5 millions/s 58.6 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q9500, Celeron E3200.

Average frames per second Core2 Quad Q9500 Celeron E3200
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 57.6 FPS 36.9 FPS
High settings 92.2 FPS 59.0 FPS
Medium settings 115.2 FPS 73.7 FPS
Low settings 144.0 FPS 92.1 FPS
Difference 0 % 36 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Quad Q9500 Celeron E3200
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 111.6 FPS 98.5 FPS
High settings 178.6 FPS 157.6 FPS
Medium settings 223.3 FPS 196.9 FPS
Low settings 279.1 FPS 246.2 FPS
Difference 0 % 11.8 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors