Core2 Quad Q9550
Celeron E3200
|
|
|
| General information | Core2 Quad Q9550 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q4 2008 | Q3 2009 |
| Used in | Desktop | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | Intel |
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Series Name | Intel Core 2 Quad | Intel Celeron |
| Core Family Name | Yorkfield | Wolfdale |
| Clock | 2.8 GHz 0 % | 2.4 GHz 14.3 % |
| Cores | 4 0 % | 2 50 % |
| Threads | 4 0 % | 2 50 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 W 0 % | 65 W 31.6 % |
| Lithography | 45 nm 0 % | 45 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
4 × 32 kB Instruction
4 × 32 kB Data |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
2 × 6 MB
|
1 × 1 MB
|
| ECC Supported | No | No |
| Multithreading Supported | No | No |
| Performance | Core2 Quad Q9550 | Celeron E3200 |
| Overall Score | 35072 0 % | 27139 22.6 % |
| Future Proof | 10 % 28.6 % | 14 % 0 % |
| Benchmark Score | 1513 0 % | 542 64.2 % |
| Single Thread Score | 1211.2 0 % | 963.2 20.5 % |
| Encrypting Data | 3447.8 MB/s 0 % | 1243.6 MB/s 63.9 % |
| Compressing Data | 48.7 MB/s 0 % | 18.2 MB/s 62.7 % |
| String objects sorting | 6473.2 thousand/s 0 % | 2521.5 thousand/s 61 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 19.1 millions/s 0 % | 3 millions/s 84.4 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 10594 millions/s 0 % | 3798.4 millions/s 64.1 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 6039.9 millions/s 0 % | 2459.5 millions/s 59.3 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q9550, Celeron E3200.
| Average frames per second | Core2 Quad Q9550 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 58.9 FPS | 36.9 FPS |
| High settings | 94.2 FPS | 59.0 FPS |
| Medium settings | 117.8 FPS | 73.7 FPS |
| Low settings | 147.2 FPS | 92.1 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 37.4 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Core2 Quad Q9550 | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 112.4 FPS | 98.5 FPS |
| High settings | 179.8 FPS | 157.6 FPS |
| Medium settings | 224.8 FPS | 196.9 FPS |
| Low settings | 281.0 FPS | 246.2 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 12.4 % |
