Xeon E5-2690 v3
Celeron 420
|
|
|
| General information | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | Celeron 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q3 2014 | Q1 2009 |
| Used in | Server | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | Intel |
| Socket | LGA2011-v3 | LGA775 |
| Series Name | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Celeron |
| Core Family Name | Haswell-EP | Conroe |
| Clock | 2.6 GHz 0 % | 1.6 GHz 38.5 % |
| Cores | 12 0 % | 1 91.7 % |
| Threads | 24 0 % | 1 95.8 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 135 W 0 % | 35 W 74.1 % |
| Lithography | 22 nm 66.2 % | 65 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
12 × 32 kB Instruction
12 × 32 kB Data |
1 × 32 kB Instruction
1 × 32 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
12 × 256 kB
|
1 × 512 kB
|
| ECC Supported | Yes | No |
| Multithreading Supported | Yes | No |
| Performance | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | Celeron 420 |
| Overall Score | 57189 0 % | 19743 65.5 % |
| Future Proof | 43 % 0 % | 11 % 74.4 % |
| Benchmark Score | 10697 0 % | 152 98.6 % |
| Single Thread Score | 1921.3 0 % | 475.2 75.3 % |
| Encrypting Data | 5065 MB/s 0 % | 345.2 MB/s 93.2 % |
| Compressing Data | 274.5 MB/s 0 % | 4.8 MB/s 98.2 % |
| String objects sorting | 38145.7 thousand/s 0 % | 829.1 thousand/s 97.8 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 74.6 millions/s 0 % | 2.4 millions/s 96.8 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 66772 millions/s 0 % | 504 millions/s 99.2 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 33655.2 millions/s 0 % | 560.3 millions/s 98.3 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Xeon E5-2690 v3, Celeron 420.
| Average frames per second | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | Celeron 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 124.6 FPS | 25.5 FPS |
| High settings | 199.3 FPS | 40.8 FPS |
| Medium settings | 249.1 FPS | 51.0 FPS |
| Low settings | 311.4 FPS | 63.8 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 79.5 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | Celeron 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 151.3 FPS | 85.3 FPS |
| High settings | 242.1 FPS | 136.4 FPS |
| Medium settings | 302.6 FPS | 170.5 FPS |
| Low settings | 378.3 FPS | 213.2 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 43.6 % |
