Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Extreme X9000
versus
Intel logo Celeron U3400

Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 logo Intel Celeron U3400 logo
General information Core2 Extreme X9000 Celeron U3400
Launched Q1 2009 Q3 2010
Used in Mobile Mobile
Factory Intel Intel
Socket PGA478 BGA1288
Clock 2.8 GHz 0 % 1.1 GHz 60.7 %
Cores 2 0 % 2 0 %
Threads 2 0 % 2 0 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 44 W 0 % 18 W 59.1 %
Performance Core2 Extreme X9000 Celeron U3400
Overall Score 29033 0 % 24033 17.2 %
Future Proof 11 % 45 % 20 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 711 0 % 334 53 %
Single Thread Score 1103.5 0 % 456 58.7 %
Encrypting Data 1620.9 MB/s 0 % 754.9 MB/s 53.4 %
Compressing Data 22 MB/s 0 % 9.6 MB/s 56.2 %
String objects sorting 3248.7 thousand/s 0 % 1268.2 thousand/s 61 %
Prime numbers generation 9.1 millions/s 0 % 5 millions/s 44.3 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 4479 millions/s 0 % 2007 millions/s 55.2 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 2585.5 millions/s 0 % 1211.2 millions/s 53.2 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Extreme X9000, Celeron U3400.

Average frames per second Core2 Extreme X9000 Celeron U3400
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 41.2 FPS 31.4 FPS
High settings 66.0 FPS 50.3 FPS
Medium settings 82.5 FPS 62.9 FPS
Low settings 103.1 FPS 78.6 FPS
Difference 0 % 23.7 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Extreme X9000 Celeron U3400
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 101.7 FPS 92.9 FPS
High settings 162.7 FPS 148.6 FPS
Medium settings 203.4 FPS 185.7 FPS
Low settings 254.2 FPS 232.2 FPS
Difference 0 % 8.7 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors