Ryzen 9 3950X
Core2 Duo E6400
|
|
|
| General information | Ryzen 9 3950X | Core2 Duo E6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q4 2019 | Q1 2009 |
| Used in | Desktop | Desktop |
| Factory | AMD | Intel |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA775 |
| Series Name | AMD Ryzen 9 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Core Family Name | Matisse | Conroe |
| Clock | 3.5 GHz 0 % | 2.1 GHz 40 % |
| Cores | 16 0 % | 2 87.5 % |
| Threads | 32 0 % | 2 93.8 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 W 0 % | 65 W 38.1 % |
| Lithography | 7 nm 89.2 % | 65 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
16 × 32 kB Instruction
16 × 64 kB Data |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
16 × 512 kB
|
1 × 2 MB
|
| ECC Supported | No | No |
| Multithreading Supported | Yes | No |
| Performance | Ryzen 9 3950X | Core2 Duo E6400 |
| Overall Score | 70772 0 % | 26519 62.5 % |
| Future Proof | 73 % 0 % | 11 % 84.9 % |
| Benchmark Score | 25086 0 % | 495 98 % |
| Single Thread Score | 2702.3 0 % | 813.6 69.9 % |
| Encrypting Data | 37736.7 MB/s 0 % | 1122.6 MB/s 97 % |
| Compressing Data | 575.2 MB/s 0 % | 16.6 MB/s 97.1 % |
| String objects sorting | 64152.2 thousand/s 0 % | 2372.2 thousand/s 96.3 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 183.4 millions/s 0 % | 4 millions/s 97.8 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 134276 millions/s 0 % | 3087 millions/s 97.7 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 77826.8 millions/s 0 % | 1688.8 millions/s 97.8 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Ryzen 9 3950X, Core2 Duo E6400.
| Average frames per second | Ryzen 9 3950X | Core2 Duo E6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 165.0 FPS | 35.6 FPS |
| High settings | 264.0 FPS | 57.0 FPS |
| Medium settings | 330.0 FPS | 71.3 FPS |
| Low settings | 412.5 FPS | 89.1 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 78.4 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Ryzen 9 3950X | Core2 Duo E6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 175.2 FPS | 97.4 FPS |
| High settings | 280.4 FPS | 155.8 FPS |
| Medium settings | 350.5 FPS | 194.7 FPS |
| Low settings | 438.1 FPS | 243.4 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 44.4 % |
