Compare processors

AMD logo EPYC 7302P
versus
Intel logo Core2 Extreme X9650

AMD EPYC 7302P logo Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 logo
General information EPYC 7302P Core2 Extreme X9650
Launched Q4 2019 Q4 2008
Used in Server Desktop
Factory AMD Intel
Socket SP3 LGA775
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 3 GHz 0 %
Cores 16 0 % 4 75 %
Threads 32 0 % 4 87.5 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 155 W 0 % 130 W 16.1 %
Performance EPYC 7302P Core2 Extreme X9650
Overall Score 67615 0 % 35254 47.9 %
Future Proof 73 % 0 % 10 % 86.3 %
Benchmark Score 20902 0 % 1545 92.6 %
Single Thread Score 1873.7 0 % 1250.6 33.3 %
Encrypting Data 30654.8 MB/s 0 % 3549.5 MB/s 88.4 %
Compressing Data 462.3 MB/s 0 % 50.2 MB/s 89.1 %
String objects sorting 52227.7 thousand/s 0 % 6805 thousand/s 87 %
Prime numbers generation 278.4 millions/s 0 % 20 millions/s 92.8 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 104043 millions/s 0 % 10945.9 millions/s 89.5 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 60802.4 millions/s 0 % 6351.7 millions/s 89.6 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for EPYC 7302P, Core2 Extreme X9650.

Average frames per second EPYC 7302P Core2 Extreme X9650
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 155.7 FPS 59.6 FPS
High settings 249.0 FPS 95.3 FPS
Medium settings 311.3 FPS 119.1 FPS
Low settings 389.1 FPS 148.9 FPS
Difference 0 % 61.7 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V EPYC 7302P Core2 Extreme X9650
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 170.6 FPS 113.0 FPS
High settings 273.0 FPS 180.7 FPS
Medium settings 341.3 FPS 225.9 FPS
Low settings 426.6 FPS 282.4 FPS
Difference 0 % 33.8 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors