Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Extreme X9650
versus
Intel logo Xeon E3110

Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 logo Intel Xeon E3110 logo
General information Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon E3110
Launched Q4 2008 Q4 2008
Used in Desktop Server
Factory Intel Intel
Socket LGA775 LGA775
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 3 GHz 0 %
Cores 4 0 % 2 50 %
Threads 4 0 % 2 50 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 W 0 % 65 W 50 %
Performance Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon E3110
Overall Score 35331 0 % 29935 15.3 %
Future Proof 10 % 0 % 10 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 1558 0 % 803 48.5 %
Single Thread Score 1273.4 4.2 % 1329.7 0 %
Encrypting Data 3536.6 MB/s 0 % 1822.6 MB/s 48.5 %
Compressing Data 50.6 MB/s 0 % 25.4 MB/s 49.9 %
String objects sorting 6757.4 thousand/s 0 % 3689.7 thousand/s 45.4 %
Prime numbers generation 19.8 millions/s 0 % 10 millions/s 49.8 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 10891.3 millions/s 0 % 5766.2 millions/s 47.1 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 6409.2 millions/s 0 % 3352.5 millions/s 47.7 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Extreme X9650, Xeon E3110.

Average frames per second Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon E3110
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 59.6 FPS 43.7 FPS
High settings 95.4 FPS 70.0 FPS
Medium settings 119.3 FPS 87.5 FPS
Low settings 149.1 FPS 109.3 FPS
Difference 0 % 26.7 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon E3110
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 112.8 FPS 103.3 FPS
High settings 180.6 FPS 165.3 FPS
Medium settings 225.7 FPS 206.6 FPS
Low settings 282.1 FPS 258.3 FPS
Difference 0 % 8.4 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors