Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Extreme X9650
versus
Intel logo Xeon X3220

Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 logo Intel Xeon X3220 logo
General information Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon X3220
Launched Q4 2008 Q2 2009
Used in Desktop Server
Factory Intel Intel
Socket LGA775 LGA775
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 2.4 GHz 20 %
Cores 4 0 % 4 0 %
Threads 4 0 % 4 0 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 W 0 % 105 W 19.2 %
Performance Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon X3220
Overall Score 35331 0 % 33607 4.9 %
Future Proof 10 % 23.1 % 13 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 1558 0 % 1276 18.1 %
Single Thread Score 1273.4 0 % 934.3 26.6 %
Encrypting Data 3536.6 MB/s 0 % 2927.4 MB/s 17.2 %
Compressing Data 50.6 MB/s 0 % 40.5 MB/s 20.1 %
String objects sorting 6757.4 thousand/s 0 % 5138.9 thousand/s 24 %
Prime numbers generation 19.8 millions/s 0 % 12 millions/s 39.6 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 10891.3 millions/s 0 % 8610.7 millions/s 20.9 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 6409.2 millions/s 0 % 4208.3 millions/s 34.3 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Extreme X9650, Xeon X3220.

Average frames per second Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon X3220
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 59.6 FPS 54.5 FPS
High settings 95.4 FPS 87.3 FPS
Medium settings 119.3 FPS 109.1 FPS
Low settings 149.1 FPS 136.4 FPS
Difference 0 % 8.6 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Extreme X9650 Xeon X3220
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 112.8 FPS 109.8 FPS
High settings 180.6 FPS 175.7 FPS
Medium settings 225.7 FPS 219.6 FPS
Low settings 282.1 FPS 274.5 FPS
Difference 0 % 2.7 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors