Compare processors

Intel logo Core2 Quad Q9000
versus
Intel logo Celeron G1610T

Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 logo Intel Celeron G1610T logo
General information Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610T
Launched Q1 2009 Q4 2013
Used in Mobile Desktop
Factory Intel Intel
Socket PGA478 LGA1155
Clock 2 GHz 13 % 2.3 GHz 0 %
Cores 4 0 % 2 50 %
Threads 4 0 % 2 50 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 W 0 % 35 W 22.2 %
Performance Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610T
Overall Score 31663 0 % 30492 3.7 %
Future Proof 11 % 71.8 % 39 % 0 %
Benchmark Score 1005 0 % 864 14 %
Single Thread Score 888.8 28.5 % 1242.9 0 %
Encrypting Data 2315.7 MB/s 0 % 1991.6 MB/s 14 %
Compressing Data 33.4 MB/s 0 % 23.3 MB/s 30.2 %
String objects sorting 4666.8 thousand/s 0 % 3065 thousand/s 34.3 %
Prime numbers generation 7.9 millions/s 20.8 % 10 millions/s 0 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 7246.9 millions/s 0 % 4883.6 millions/s 32.6 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 3929.3 millions/s 0 % 3623.7 millions/s 7.8 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core2 Quad Q9000, Celeron G1610T.

Average frames per second Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610T
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 49.2 FPS 45.6 FPS
High settings 78.6 FPS 73.0 FPS
Medium settings 98.3 FPS 91.3 FPS
Low settings 122.9 FPS 114.1 FPS
Difference 0 % 7.2 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core2 Quad Q9000 Celeron G1610T
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 106.2 FPS 104.1 FPS
High settings 169.9 FPS 166.5 FPS
Medium settings 212.4 FPS 208.1 FPS
Low settings 265.5 FPS 260.2 FPS
Difference 0 % 2 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors