Compare processors

AMD logo EPYC 8324P
versus
Intel logo Core2 Quad Q9550

AMD EPYC 8324P logo Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 logo
General information EPYC 8324P Core2 Quad Q9550
Launched Q1 2024 Q4 2008
Used in Server Desktop
Factory AMD Intel
Socket SP6 LGA775
Clock 2.7 GHz 3.6 % 2.8 GHz 0 %
Cores 32 0 % 4 87.5 %
Threads 64 0 % 4 93.8 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 W 0 % 95 W 47.2 %
Performance EPYC 8324P Core2 Quad Q9550
Overall Score 77690 0 % 35071 54.9 %
Future Proof 98 % 0 % 10 % 89.8 %
Benchmark Score 36430 0 % 1513 95.8 %
Single Thread Score 2347.7 0 % 1216.1 48.2 %
Encrypting Data 62964.6 MB/s 0 % 3426.6 MB/s 94.6 %
Compressing Data 953.2 MB/s 0 % 48.5 MB/s 94.9 %
String objects sorting 110158 thousand/s 0 % 6589.8 thousand/s 94 %
Prime numbers generation 325.4 millions/s 0 % 18.9 millions/s 94.2 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 246404 millions/s 0 % 10615.4 millions/s 95.7 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 138434 millions/s 0 % 6046 millions/s 95.6 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for EPYC 8324P, Core2 Quad Q9550.

Average frames per second EPYC 8324P Core2 Quad Q9550
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 185.6 FPS 58.9 FPS
High settings 297.0 FPS 94.2 FPS
Medium settings 371.2 FPS 117.7 FPS
Low settings 464.0 FPS 147.2 FPS
Difference 0 % 68.3 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V EPYC 8324P Core2 Quad Q9550
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 187.6 FPS 112.2 FPS
High settings 300.1 FPS 179.4 FPS
Medium settings 375.2 FPS 224.3 FPS
Low settings 469.0 FPS 280.4 FPS
Difference 0 % 40.2 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors