Xeon E5-2620
Core2 Duo E6700
|
|
|
| General information | Xeon E5-2620 | Core2 Duo E6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Q2 2012 | Q1 2010 |
| Used in | Server | Desktop |
| Factory | Intel | Intel |
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA775 |
| Series Name | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Core Family Name | Sandy Bridge-EP | Conroe |
| Clock | 2 GHz 25.9 % | 2.7 GHz 0 % |
| Cores | 6 0 % | 2 66.7 % |
| Threads | 12 0 % | 2 83.3 % |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 W 0 % | 65 W 31.6 % |
| Lithography | 32 nm 50.8 % | 65 nm 0 % |
| L1 Cache |
6 × 32 kB Instruction
6 × 32 kB Data |
2 × 32 kB Instruction
2 × 32 kB Data |
| L2 Cache |
6 × 256 kB
|
1 × 4 MB
|
| ECC Supported | Yes | No |
| Multithreading Supported | Yes | No |
| Performance | Xeon E5-2620 | Core2 Duo E6700 |
| Overall Score | 43006 0 % | 28285 34.2 % |
| Future Proof | 30 % 0 % | 17 % 43.3 % |
| Benchmark Score | 3421 0 % | 640 81.3 % |
| Single Thread Score | 1104.6 0 % | 1030.2 6.7 % |
| Encrypting Data | 1597.1 MB/s 0 % | 1455.5 MB/s 8.9 % |
| Compressing Data | 86.2 MB/s 0 % | 21.4 MB/s 75.1 % |
| String objects sorting | 13296.4 thousand/s 0 % | 3002 thousand/s 77.4 % |
| Prime numbers generation | 29.9 millions/s 0 % | 6 millions/s 79.9 % |
| Mathemathic operations (integer) | 20545 millions/s 0 % | 4009 millions/s 80.5 % |
| Mathemathic operations (float) | 7721.1 millions/s 0 % | 2153.8 millions/s 72.1 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Xeon E5-2620, Core2 Duo E6700.
| Average frames per second | Xeon E5-2620 | Core2 Duo E6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 82.4 FPS | 39.4 FPS |
| High settings | 131.8 FPS | 63.0 FPS |
| Medium settings | 164.8 FPS | 78.8 FPS |
| Low settings | 206.0 FPS | 98.5 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 52.2 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
| Grand Theft Auto V | Xeon E5-2620 | Core2 Duo E6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
| Ultra settings | 126.2 FPS | 100.2 FPS |
| High settings | 201.9 FPS | 160.3 FPS |
| Medium settings | 252.4 FPS | 200.3 FPS |
| Low settings | 315.4 FPS | 250.4 FPS |
| Difference | 0 % | 20.6 % |
