Compare processors

Intel logo Core i9-10900F
versus
Intel logo Xeon X3210

Intel Core i9-10900F logo Intel Xeon X3210 logo
General information Core i9-10900F Xeon X3210
Launched Q3 2020 Q4 2008
Used in Desktop Server
Factory Intel Intel
Socket FCLGA1200 LGA775
Clock 2.8 GHz 0 % 2.1 GHz 25 %
Cores 10 0 % 4 60 %
Threads 20 0 % 4 80 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 W 38.1 % 105 W 0 %
Performance Core i9-10900F Xeon X3210
Overall Score 59987 0 % 30237 49.6 %
Future Proof 78 % 0 % 10 % 87.2 %
Benchmark Score 12949 0 % 836 93.5 %
Single Thread Score 3002.7 0 % 815.2 72.9 %
Encrypting Data 6722.9 MB/s 0 % 1922.3 MB/s 71.4 %
Compressing Data 309.3 MB/s 0 % 23.8 MB/s 92.3 %
String objects sorting 39670.5 thousand/s 0 % 4233.5 thousand/s 89.3 %
Prime numbers generation 57.6 millions/s 0 % 4 millions/s 93.1 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 80216.4 millions/s 0 % 2942.3 millions/s 96.3 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 48632.3 millions/s 0 % 3624.8 millions/s 92.5 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core i9-10900F, Xeon X3210.

Average frames per second Core i9-10900F Xeon X3210
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 132.9 FPS 44.6 FPS
High settings 212.6 FPS 71.4 FPS
Medium settings 265.8 FPS 89.3 FPS
Low settings 332.2 FPS 111.6 FPS
Difference 0 % 66.4 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Core i9-10900F Xeon X3210
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 156.3 FPS 103.9 FPS
High settings 250.0 FPS 166.3 FPS
Medium settings 312.5 FPS 207.8 FPS
Low settings 390.7 FPS 259.8 FPS
Difference 0 % 33.5 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors