Compare processors

AMD logo EPYC 7302P
versus
Intel logo Celeron G1620

AMD EPYC 7302P logo Intel Celeron G1620 logo
General information EPYC 7302P Celeron G1620
Launched Q4 2019 Q1 2013
Used in Server Desktop
Factory AMD Intel
Socket SP3 FCLGA1155
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 2.7 GHz 10 %
Cores 16 0 % 2 87.5 %
Threads 32 0 % 2 93.8 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 155 W 0 % 55 W 64.5 %
Performance EPYC 7302P Celeron G1620
Overall Score 67763 0 % 31690 53.2 %
Future Proof 73 % 0 % 34 % 53.4 %
Benchmark Score 21084 0 % 1009 95.2 %
Single Thread Score 1855 0 % 1458.3 21.4 %
Encrypting Data 30685.7 MB/s 0 % 2286.2 MB/s 92.5 %
Compressing Data 464.2 MB/s 0 % 27 MB/s 94.2 %
String objects sorting 52018.6 thousand/s 0 % 3543.6 thousand/s 93.2 %
Prime numbers generation 277 millions/s 0 % 10.1 millions/s 96.4 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 102496 millions/s 0 % 5559.1 millions/s 94.6 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 60924.8 millions/s 0 % 4079.6 millions/s 93.3 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for EPYC 7302P, Celeron G1620.

Average frames per second EPYC 7302P Celeron G1620
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 156.0 FPS 48.9 FPS
High settings 249.6 FPS 78.3 FPS
Medium settings 312.0 FPS 97.9 FPS
Low settings 390.1 FPS 122.3 FPS
Difference 0 % 68.6 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V EPYC 7302P Celeron G1620
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 169.9 FPS 106.3 FPS
High settings 271.9 FPS 170.1 FPS
Medium settings 339.9 FPS 212.7 FPS
Low settings 424.9 FPS 265.8 FPS
Difference 0 % 37.4 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors