Compare processors

Intel logo Xeon W-3275M
versus
Intel logo Celeron G1610

Intel Xeon W-3275M logo Intel Celeron G1610 logo
General information Xeon W-3275M Celeron G1610
Launched Q1 2020 Q4 2012
Used in Server Desktop
Factory Intel Intel
Socket FCLGA3647 FCLGA1155
Clock 2.5 GHz 3.8 % 2.6 GHz 0 %
Cores 28 0 % 2 92.9 %
Threads 56 0 % 2 96.4 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 205 W 0 % 55 W 73.2 %
Performance Xeon W-3275M Celeron G1610
Overall Score 70951 0 % 31470 55.6 %
Future Proof 75 % 0 % 33 % 56 %
Benchmark Score 25342 0 % 981 96.1 %
Single Thread Score 2701.4 0 % 1367.7 49.4 %
Encrypting Data 19279.7 MB/s 0 % 2219.1 MB/s 88.5 %
Compressing Data 780.5 MB/s 0 % 26.3 MB/s 96.6 %
String objects sorting 83039.7 thousand/s 0 % 3390.1 thousand/s 95.9 %
Prime numbers generation 148.3 millions/s 0 % 10 millions/s 93.3 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 162600 millions/s 0 % 5403.2 millions/s 96.7 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 96699.3 millions/s 0 % 3928.3 millions/s 95.9 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Xeon W-3275M, Celeron G1610.

Average frames per second Xeon W-3275M Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 165.4 FPS 48.3 FPS
High settings 264.7 FPS 77.2 FPS
Medium settings 330.9 FPS 96.5 FPS
Low settings 413.6 FPS 120.7 FPS
Difference 0 % 70.8 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V Xeon W-3275M Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 175.4 FPS 106.0 FPS
High settings 280.7 FPS 169.6 FPS
Medium settings 350.9 FPS 211.9 FPS
Low settings 438.6 FPS 264.9 FPS
Difference 0 % 39.6 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors