Compare processors

AMD logo EPYC 7302
versus
Intel logo Celeron G1610

AMD EPYC 7302 logo Intel Celeron G1610 logo
General information EPYC 7302 Celeron G1610
Launched Q1 2020 Q4 2012
Used in Server Desktop
Factory AMD Intel
Socket SP3 FCLGA1155
Clock 3 GHz 0 % 2.6 GHz 13.3 %
Cores 16 0 % 2 87.5 %
Threads 32 0 % 2 93.8 %
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 155 W 0 % 55 W 64.5 %
Performance EPYC 7302 Celeron G1610
Overall Score 67964 0 % 31470 53.7 %
Future Proof 75 % 0 % 33 % 56 %
Benchmark Score 21336 0 % 981 95.4 %
Single Thread Score 2031.1 0 % 1367.7 32.7 %
Encrypting Data 31248 MB/s 0 % 2219.1 MB/s 92.9 %
Compressing Data 466.9 MB/s 0 % 26.3 MB/s 94.4 %
String objects sorting 52824.3 thousand/s 0 % 3390.1 thousand/s 93.6 %
Prime numbers generation 302 millions/s 0 % 10 millions/s 96.7 %
Mathemathic operations (integer) 102760 millions/s 0 % 5403.2 millions/s 94.7 %
Mathemathic operations (float) 61792.2 millions/s 0 % 3928.3 millions/s 93.6 %

Comparison of average FPS

Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for EPYC 7302, Celeron G1610.

Average frames per second EPYC 7302 Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 156.6 FPS 48.3 FPS
High settings 250.5 FPS 77.2 FPS
Medium settings 313.1 FPS 96.5 FPS
Low settings 391.4 FPS 120.7 FPS
Difference 0 % 69.2 %

Grand Theft Auto V Frames per second

Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.

Grand Theft Auto V EPYC 7302 Celeron G1610
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels   Change
Ultra settings 170.2 FPS 106.0 FPS
High settings 272.3 FPS 169.6 FPS
Medium settings 340.4 FPS 211.9 FPS
Low settings 425.5 FPS 264.9 FPS
Difference 0 % 37.7 %
Configuration Settings
Gaming astronaut image
Video game
Required
Screen resolution Screen resolution image
Required
Screen resolution image
Compare processors
Processor image
Processor Processor image
Selected processors