General information | Core i9-10900 | Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
---|---|---|
Launched | Q2 2020 | Q3 2013 |
Used in | Desktop | Server |
Factory | Intel | Intel |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA2011 |
Series Name | Intel Core i9 | Intel Xeon E5 |
Core Family Name | Comet Lake | Ivy Bridge-EP |
Clock | 2.8 GHz 0 % | 2.6 GHz 7.1 % |
Turbo Clock | 5.2 GHz 0 % | 3.4 GHz 34.6 % |
Cores | 10 0 % | 8 20 % |
Threads | 20 0 % | 16 20 % |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 W 31.6 % | 95 W 0 % |
Lithography | 14 nm 36.4 % | 22 nm 0 % |
L1 Cache |
10 × 32 kB Instruction
10 × 32 kB Data |
8 × 32 kB Instruction
8 × 32 kB Data |
L2 Cache |
10 × 256 kB
|
8 × 256 kB
|
L3 Cache |
1 × 20 MB
|
1 × 20 MB
|
ECC Supported | No | Yes |
Multithreading Supported | Yes | Yes |
Performance | Core i9-10900 | Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
Overall Score | 59881 0 % | 50277 16 % |
Future Proof | 76 % 0 % | 37 % 51.3 % |
Benchmark Score | 12857 0 % | 6390 50.3 % |
Single Thread Score | 3033 0 % | 1684.9 44.4 % |
Encrypting Data | 7001 MB/s 0 % | 2965.1 MB/s 57.6 % |
Compressing Data | 307.9 MB/s 0 % | 168.6 MB/s 45.3 % |
String objects sorting | 38792.3 thousand/s 0 % | 23407.7 thousand/s 39.7 % |
Prime numbers generation | 56.5 millions/s 0 % | 46.4 millions/s 17.9 % |
Mathemathic operations (integer) | 78932.8 millions/s 0 % | 37939.8 millions/s 51.9 % |
Mathemathic operations (float) | 48308 millions/s 0 % | 19124.1 millions/s 60.4 % |
Comparison of average FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Core i9-10900, Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Average frames per second | Core i9-10900 | Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
---|---|---|
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
Ultra settings | 132.6 FPS | 104.0 FPS |
High settings | 212.1 FPS | 166.4 FPS |
Medium settings | 265.1 FPS | 208.0 FPS |
Low settings | 331.4 FPS | 260.0 FPS |
Difference | 0 % | 21.5 % |
Comparison of FPS count by settings on resolution 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) in game 1920 × 1080 (FHD (1080p)) for Grand Theft Auto V.
Grand Theft Auto V | Core i9-10900 | Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
---|---|---|
Screen resolution: 1920 × 1080 pixels Change | ||
Ultra settings | 156.2 FPS | 139.3 FPS |
High settings | 250.0 FPS | 222.8 FPS |
Medium settings | 312.5 FPS | 278.5 FPS |
Low settings | 390.6 FPS | 348.1 FPS |
Difference | 0 % | 10.9 % |